The author believes that it is necessary to reduce the weight of "click" to the website. A user favorite Website design It is true that more people click on it, but when someone uses this way to cheat, does Baidu need to adjust its algorithm again?

This article may offend a large number of people. But there is a block in my heart. Baidu had 21 good websites last month and 28 good websites last month. Many diligent webmasters were shot, but there were a number of websites that I knew were cheating, but they were very healthy and ranked steadily. I wonder why Baidu is not the one that cheats? This can only make me these small and medium-sized webmasters very cold.

Using Baidu's user experience, we know that there is a cheating mode. To cheat on vulnerabilities that give high weight to the number of user clicks, it is simply to simulate IP simulation labor, and some even spend a lot of money to invite some people to click manually. The specific operation mode is as follows:

The software adopts the method of real person simulation click, random click. Completely random, more realistic, more consistent with the user's search habits, making your ranking more stable and reliable;

One IP address, exclusive mode. The search is only performed once a day, not shared with other users or other keywords, so that each click can be distinguished independently, making the click more secure and authentic;

Let the words with regional characteristics only allow clicking in the IP address of this region, and click by region. More consistent with search engine data. For example, only IP addresses in Shanghai are allowed to be clicked;

Let the daily click and time period click. Accurately allocated to each hour, and accurately controlled the number of hits on peak and valley every day, more in line with the user's search habits.

Compared with other cheating modes such as machines, the concealment of this mode lies in its manual click and previous collection. With stronger concealment, Baidu has no way to identify.

I think this direction is right, but does the specification of some specific details really conform to the "user experience"? Such specifications will only bring more vicious user experiences. So how can we solve this problem? I feel that Baidu is talking about "user experience".
This article was published by Beijing Website Construction Company Shangpin China //ihucc.com/